"So if we include that $ 953,000 above, how much does that strenghten your argument?? You claim that because some of these ports were shipped late last year, it should help forward growth ??? Huh ?
Meaning we have $ 953,000 + $ 3,762,000 ( $ 3,762,000 is product revenues for Q ending Mar. 31, 1999 ) plus possibly some of the balance of the 10,500 ports shipped between the end of last Q ( March 31, 1999 ) and up to seth's post of June 27,1999( that is "assuming" seths information was supplied by the company, if it was not, then where did it come from ). Still leaving 9,500 ports to go until Dec. 31, 1999.
I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but your argument has just been weakened. That is a fact, not an assumption."
what i am claiming is that PROJECTED GROWTH for USAT
is not slowing. say they have 10,500 ports shipped
between last december and now. that is a 7 month timeframe.
between now and the end of the year, 6 months, they will
approximately double that.
by the way, you cant assume that all product
revenues are USAT. that would be a bad
assumption
|
