Sid, I understand why you wish to ignore that the June 22nd release makes that Simms bit from your prior post a crock, but I don't understand your failure to apologize, when some of your speculation was clearly based in your failure to be aware of the news combined with your usual negative slant. We do know that your comments concerning whether Sims is still involved were just wasted negative speculations.
You state that what I say doesn't hold water, without offering rhyme nor reason, and I beg to differ. What did I say? Stick to the point, how do you justify your statement that Antaeus could not have been a customer of DCHT when claimed? Show evidence-this might prove DCHT lied. Where's the beef? If you are right, fine. For now, you are fantasizing this stuff, reading in things that aren't there, assuming unreported notions, IMHO. By the by, have we heard the name "Antaeus Research" before?
Dan B |
