Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Catfish who wrote (12963)	7/4/1999 3:53:00 PM
From: PiMac	Read Replies (1) of 13994

Darrell, Unified, has a lot to like. The approach is one finally in tune with the problem. I have copied the main article to devote some serious reading to it. Naturally, I have some different emphasis', but maybe we can agree on some territory. One thing I'd lke to leave before then is an observation I made of the three types of presidencies that modern Presidents have fulfilled. The President who wade the term modern president meaningful is FDR. He/his presidency increased the power, control, presence of the Fed. Gov't so much that the Feds impact every citizen significantly. I am not applauding this just pointing out where and why Presidents since then are different. FDR/Truman put us thruough grat change. This led to Eisenhower's terms which had little ideologically change. The liberal ideology of Kennedy/Johnson's terms arose from the Fed. The country seemed able to take this more-change. Eventually, this liberal current was turned back, the country led by Nixon and in turn, installed by the country. After some terms of low change/non-ideology [Ford/Carter], the country was ready for the ideological swing of the pendulum. Reagan/Bush were selected, and led the Conservative ideology current. Clinton continued the current-stop current-no current-current pattern by being installed to stop the Conservative current. The point to this observation is that the logical comparison between President Clinton is with Nixon. Another aberrent personality. It might be the nature of the function of the job the President is called upon to perform in these circumstances that appeals only to the off-balance candidates, and the country to install them. Sorry, no proofing--my hands are giving pain.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next