With all respect, you better await the ruling in the AZNT federal case against Andy Mann (defaulted), First Concorde
(defaulted), DTC, Canadian Depository, Whitecliffe, JB Oxford, Shoreline & Canacorde. You will see that the corruption
extends from the message boards all the way to the DTC.
A company under assault from professional shorts endures much maliciousness, threats & punishment the public is not even
aware of.
The WSJ article was neutral imo, but nevertheless, Mr. Sylver & myself, both plaintiffs against Shell & co., were not a liberty to
expound on the lengths these individuals have gone to. I hope the federal case ruling will show the investment public how far
the corruption extends, but the defamation & libel suit will show all , imo, certain individuals roles in the smear campaigns,
shorting, manipulation , interference with the ability to do business and the use of S.I. as a tool to accomplish these goals.
Being a long AZNT shareholder who gave testimony in the federal case, entered evidence, saw the bullet holes, spoken to the
authorities, been to AZNT facilities , use their products, and speak with the AZNT legal team, I await the ruling in the federal
case with much enthusiasm. It will set a precendence for other companies who have been wronged by these individuals and
their actions. The defamation & libel suit will put together all the pieces and refer to the federal case how far the corruption
extends. I wish the best for the HITT case as well, and applaud them for acting quickly on behalf of HITT shareholders, but I
suggest you not be so flippant about the AZNT defamation case, its greater in scope than the HITT complaint and was/is
preceded by the Federal case against Andy MAnn, et al.
clothes changed, out to the fireworks! Have a great 4th!
Pugs
**********************************************************************
From another thread |
