SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Snowshoe who wrote (5664)7/5/1999 10:23:00 AM
From: w2j2  Read Replies (1) of 10309
 
Interesting tidbit regarding I2O from ANCR post 23181:

NGIO changes the method that the CPU uses to transfer data. Instead of the directly
synchronized transfers between the peripheral and a CPU, NGIO uses messages to
create packets of data that can be sent between each Target Channel Adapter and the
Host Channel Adapter. Even I2O, which offloads I/O processing from the CPU to the
I/O controller, still uses synchronous communications, which is clearly a limiting factor.

NGIO's asynchronous communication frees the CPU from having to wait for data from
the slower peripherals. With multiprocessor systems, this becomes even more
important, as processors tend to compete for the slower peripheral bus.

****

We have been been told that I2O is still coming, and that I2O will be incorporated in the new I/O standards. But judging by the poor I2O revenues to Wind, and the paucity of news, and the Wind stock price, I have my doubts. This snippet indicates that NGIO and Future I/O may pass by I2O.

I am long Wind, and believe the future is bright, but I am prepared to write off any significant contribution from I2O. Are there any technology buffs familiar with NGIO and Future I/O who can enlighten me? wj
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext