JS: FWIW - your presumption about bashing - let them sue a shareholder who has asked for clarification when it was found out Lehman's could not and would not acknowledge XSNI which manning said was being moved to the "corrected" listing by Lehmans, and that along with that listing corrction, it would become the IPO. Andy Laslow @ Lehman's UK - "What makes you think an OTCBB would even be considered for an IPO? And prove that XSNI is xstream UK." Also don't forget "our man of integrity" in the UK, Mike Langdon who posted lots of information and provided names and dates via emails - and all I wanted was confirmation by manning or an officer of the corporation and third party verification, which to date has been absent. Your inference is heard loudly and clearly JS, however, the publicity would do manning no good and I am just a shareholder with some valid concerns. Ever hear of a frivilous law suit. Go ask your buddies on the Lars thread.
Could be a great avenue for discovery and to find out exactly what XSNI consists of. As I have indicated throughout my posts on this thread, all of my documentation is in public records, past documents in courts the UK exchange, the US papers, etc. All I have been doing is requesting clarification, and all questions began as soon as Lehmans UK would not substantiate manning's claims. Frivolous, and I could countersue as well :) - this has taken such a toll...
As for GAAY, you are slimey johnny come lately as usual. but in this case, better late than never; do some dd - you will find your beloved profitpicks happened to select a good stock for once. Thank god I do other dd underground, so you don't get hold of my other holdings and latch onto them too. |
