Ya got a point there. It IS too bad management refused to allow the call to be accessible. It don't cost all that much to allow an extra week of availability, so I suppose the only reason for it is legal.
Be that as it may, it sounds like sumbody got it down on tape(or maybe opened a download file at the commencement of the c.c.?), and if'n they've the capability it'd be nice to get a copy of the file via all the usual .wav capabilities. Do we have any volunteers out there? My e-mail address is on my profile. ;-)
As for all the recent commentary.....I will say it's clear, at least to me, that when folks are reduced to arguing about the demeanor of the presentators....well...clearly arguments have gotten stretch very thin, eh? HEH! And as for the various shill queries made by, and to, sundry individuals....well....I've yet to see ANYONE clearly refute the questions. Lot'sa hemming and hawing of a wounded ego sort. Bottom Line? It's all been rather Clintonesque.
Soooooo, let me go first. I am not now, nor at any point in the past, been paid for any commentary placed on this, or sundry other threads. I am a private individual who has a diverse set of holdings of various categories(and stances), one of which is VLNC. My stance with VLNC is bullish, based on the speculative merits it presents. Any gain rendered to me will be based solely on such personal monies as I have invested with regard to said merits. No other methods of gain are being employed.
Now....anyone else??? HEH!!
John~ |
