TEVT ( New revolutionary chemical additive ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TEVT ( New revolutionary chemical additive )

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Don Johnstone who wrote (4)	7/5/1999 5:33:00 PM
From: Red Arrow	of 37

I just saw your post, and got some feedback from a Du Pont guy who was in foamed plastics R&D. After he stopped laughing, he said that this is the type of nonsense that gets plastics a bad name after people find out the truth about this type of hyperbole. Here's a fax he sent me with a quote from their handbook on foamed plastics - "people often think that a foamed plastic part is stronger than a solid plastic one. Substitution of a gas void for solid polymer is unlikely to yield a stronger product........property loss is 1 to 1.5% times as great as the percent of density reduction...particularly in impact strength...our experience indicates that physical properties.... decline linearly with density reduction down to about 20% and then ... at a steeeper slope down to about 40%... " He says no need to visit the company to check them out, just ask them to send you copies of the physical property data with their stuff compared to a solid plastic part. Most companies send out the physical property data on anything new that will show their claims are valid, and if they cannot send you the data you can figure it out from there youself. If their Morfoam product is so great then the property data will show that, and will not tell you any secrets about their stuff. As I understand it, and it seems logical, if it does what they claim where the the supporting test results? I got taken in by the Starlite superplastic which was supposed to beable to with stand a nuclear bomb burst, but not for long when the "inventor" would not show any test report results, the US government said they would love to see data, and if they had tested Starlite in the real conditions it would be hard to hide the mushroom cloud and blast! No data, no good, he says. It's bit late maybe but, best I can do.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next