New EPAC player without MicroOS:
Now, if that were true, I would consider that to be bad news. As far as I know, you cannot have an EPAC player without MicroOS Audio. But, what if I'm wrong. If news like that came out today, would you sale your shares?
Don't try to avoid an interesting topic of discussion, by telling me to stop worrying. I'm not worrying. I think it is interesting. What would you do if some other company issued a press release about an EPAC player that did not use MicroOS? Would you be surprised that LU had been "sleeping around?"
By the way,
-----Original Message-----
From: InfoMan <chrisng@pacific.net.sg>
Date: Saturday, July 03, 1999 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: ZMP- 3000
>We intend release a product at the end of the year that can handle
>multiformats like MS Audio, MP3, MP4 and EPAC too.
>We will release ZipMan 3000 in August. and the demand has been incredible.
>Thanks and rgds,
>Chris
>
>You are on our mailing list
>-----Original Message-----
>To: webmaster@zipaudio.com <webmaster@zipaudio.com>
>Date: Friday, July 02, 1999 2:42 PM
>Subject: ZMP- 3000
>
>
>>Great product!
>>
>>Do you have any plans to start making a portable digital player that uses
>>the EPAC format?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Walter Morton
Isn't there already a player on the market that boasts of multiformats? Does that include EPAC? If yes, are they "getting by" without using MicroOS? |
