SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Famous SI PIG ZSUN DISCOVERY QUESTIONS THREAD
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: R.E.B. who wrote (15)7/6/1999 3:19:00 PM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (3) of 96
 
it is highly unlikely that discovery would go out by a defendant ahead of actually be served. To do so might constitute a waiver of the due order of pleas, to the jurisdiction, to venue and special exceptions.

And that's why I advised against it.

but I don't think I would do that, as the notice may constitute "an appearance" by the defendant prior to service of the summons.

Especially risky as to the waiver of objection for personal jurisdiction.

What's even more likely is that defendants won't get served at all.

The text of the complaint has been deleted from SI. What was the basis for jdx? Diversity? It's pretty risky naming specific does in a complaint that may wreck diversity jdx.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News