(off topic) a science question about past discussions on cold fusion
gold to mercury+heat to lead+heat , one charged particle at a time
Casaubon, since I know not, is this idea folly ?
what projectile is needed for the fusions mentioned above ?
if that projectile needed is hard to load into the gun
then identify a projectile easy to load, and work forward....until
shoot X into Holder(Y) and out comes Z
X is a projectile easy to load and aim and shoot into left side of Holder
Holder is something that can hold Y's
Holder is very strong and hard to damage with a projectile or heat
when X enters left side of Holder, then
X hits Y (fission) and out right side of Holder a Z particle shoots out, and
this process is cascaded with Z becoming an X projectile, that
shoots into the next Holder that contains the Y variable,
with Y being selected that will fission into the next new Z
If the substance or seed needed to cause cold fusion onto a promising target
is not known, then maybe the above series of events could be run with a
constant changing of those used to start the cascading of events that will
eventually result with a different try on the end target, hoping for fusion.
Would a possible Holder be a bunch of buckie balls formed into tubes ?
If so, filling them and as in a cloths line, hanging them, could be hard.
I see that I now have 125+ unread posts on this thread to read, and its
just been 15 hours. I'll try the new SI Beta interface since it has
the ability to view 10 posts at a time so all I need to do is scrolling
without point and click each time on NEXT.
doug |
