SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : SNRS- Sunrise Technologies
SNRS 0.0000010000.0%Jun 6 11:01 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe who wrote (2615)7/7/1999 3:17:00 PM
From: aroundight  Read Replies (1) of 4140
 
Joe, Thank you for the informative post. One question I still have is whether the 200 million estimate for people that could benefit from the procedure includes both people with hyperopia and people with presbyopia. If so, I wonder how it breaks down.

I am going on gut reaction, but it seems to me the SNRS procedure would be an easier choice for hyperopes than presbyopes. Correction of distance vision is an obvious advantage. But as I understand it, correction of presbyopia by SNRS involves inducing slight myopia in one eye. I wonder if many candidates for this surgery might not want to make this trade off. (I have PRK corrected vision and no presbyopia yet, but when it occurs I think I will be reluctant to tinker with further surgery, particularly if it could undermine my distance vision even slightly. But maybe that's just me.)

I don't mean this as a dig on SNRS. I am long and happy. But I wonder if others have thoughts on the relative potential re hyperopia v. presbyopia.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext