Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jacalyn Deaner who wrote (6799)	7/8/1999 2:31:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) of 32912

My eye caught the phrase: (B) If a subpoena (i) requires disclosure of a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information,... the court may order appearance or production only upon specified conditions. How about if everyone who was concerned about this gave formal notice to SI that they considered the identification of the person using the SI alias to be a trade secret? I don't know the legal definition of a trade secret (I don't work in that area of law), but I don't see why one couldn't at least make the claim. It would certainly muddy the waters.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next