SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?*

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawaii60 who wrote (10855)7/8/1999 4:23:00 PM
From: musicguy  Read Replies (2) of 30916
 
Here is the text you asked for regarding responses to the greenberg scumbags article. I wouldn t sign up for that shit either, but it comes free with etrade..

"
TSC readers, why don't you tell us what you really think about
Herb Greenberg's column Has IDT Been Making Loans to a
Company That Doesn't Technically Exist? Seems Herb hasn't
taken this kind of beating since his Iomega (IOM:NYSE) days.
Check out what's been said. Then jump on the bandwagon or fly to
the column's defense by emailing us. Don't forget your full name,
not to mention any position in IDT.

And the Problem Is...?

I don't see the problem with companies funding start-ups. This is
not a conforming bank loan and it's easier if you loan the money
rather than send it as capital to write off if the project goes belly-up. If
there was really something nefarious going on, I would appreciate
your thoughts, but in this case: So what?

P.S. I'm long IDT (IDTC:Nasdaq).

-- Michael Lee (received 7/7)

I am surprised you released this article without getting all the facts. It
seems to me you were a little hasty and could have done a better
job of filling in the holes.

Tantalizing as it may be, hasty journalism is not that valuable to
serious investors.

-- Erwin Hosono (received 7/7)

Having been a public accountant for many years and understanding
what you were trying to say in your article on IDT, I feel it was nothing
more than a cheap shot that gives me reason to question your
motives and reporting responsibilities.

-- Chuck Irwin (received 7/8)

I think that investigative reporting is a good thing, and corrupt
companies should be scrutinized by brokers and journalists to
safeguard all investors. On that point, here's credit to you, Herb!

But if you don't mind my saying so, I think you thought you had a big
story you couldn't wait to publish. You should talk directly to the
CEO of IDT first before going to press.

If this is a favored loan and is related, as you think it is, then you
should as a responsible citizen report the matter to the SEC. As an
investor of IDT, you have created more uncertainty and have not
published anything concrete. On this count, you have failed. I await
more on this story with trepidation!

-- Hock Chua (received /7/8)

Herb Greenberg: I read your column on IDT. You insinuate many
shady things without evidence. This is shabby journalism at the
least and possibly slanderous and libelous. I had signed up for your
service but now I'm going to cancel my subscription. Do you realize
that what you publish may affect investors' financial health?

I as well as many others lost significant amounts of money today due
to your careless "journalism." I hope that either shareholders or IDT
takes legal action against you for the damage inflicted today by this
crap. I wonder how many other investors will cancel their
subscriptions because of your underhanded work. You will never
have any of my business in the future.

-- Lt. Michael A. Bidus, MC, USNR (received 7/7)

The first sentence of the article is totally misleading and certainly
doesn't tie in with rest. If you want to be a shill for people like David
Rocker, that's fine, but why not state that and disclose what benefits
you are receiving from this relationship?

I have seen the same kind of slanted reporting once before from
you with respect to C-Cube (CUBE:Nasdaq). It wasn't wrong, just
misleading and slanted and, just like this story, was made public just
as the stock started to gain some nice momentum. That movement
was nipped in the bud by this kind of reporting.

You mention the credit line but do not say how much is outstanding.
You don't tell us exactly what this company does and whether IDT
has an interest in it.

Did you ask these questions of anyone? If the company doesn't
exist, why didn't you speak with IDT's auditors? A $25 million line is a
material item, I would think.

I plan on reporting this matter to the SEC. I am tired of your antics,
and I would hope that the editor would crack down on some of this
self-serving drivel.

-- Armin Sternberg (received 7/7)

Until today, I had a degree of measured respect for what I thought
was journalism, and the efforts of your company. Yes, I am an IDT
shareholder long term. However, I would be just as shocked if you
had written the article on any other company, public or private. I do
know one thing -- after sampling the "free trial" period with The
Street.com, I will not return.

-- Steve Washington (received 7/7)

I hope I didn't pay a subscription to have articles like this written.

You guys could write pieces like this all day long about every soap
opera in every company. If you really want to do this, why don't you
go after the big boys?

-- Michael Leone (received 7/7)

Herb, I really miss your columns that focus on companies that are on
the go, not the decline. I made money off your article on Verity
(VRTY:Nasdaq) and really look forward to discovering what to invest
in.

-- Jim Robertson (received 7/7)

That does it!

That last piece of trash from Greenberg re: IDT was so bad that he
hurt the credibility of TheStreet.com. You really need to rein him in
or get rid of him. That was such unbelievably bad reporting. Send
him to the National Enquirer. He has a future there.

If the TheStreet.com continues such trash reporting, I'll pull my
subscription and encourage many others to do the same.

-- Jeff Colter (received 7/7)"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext