SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CheckFree Holdings Corp. (CKFR), the next Dell, Intel?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Benny Baga who wrote (7823)7/8/1999 4:39:00 PM
From: Jon Stept  Read Replies (1) of 20297
 
Benny Baga, re:"sure they could save a little money..."

Hi Benny,

I think this may take further research because large corporations mailings can take advantage of bulk mailing rates.. how these rates are calculated is a mystery to me. The corporation sending the bill would save money by bundling bills together, and it would also save money by removing the inserts. Would it be cost effective?.... it is open for debate at this point until we can get some hard figures. I would think so.

Another question I have is if the inserts are just filling in the mailing up to the postage required, or if they actually have to pay just as much to mail the insert as the bill. I would be surprised if it was the latter.

I don't agree with your comment, "the systems aren't set up to bulk mail consumer bills to one location". I have seen many bills from Pacific Bell to one address, each was a different account number. Don't take my word for it, ask someone who works in a large corporate accounting department.

I agree with your comment in regards to the inserts. That advertising space would be lost.

Just my opinion, and thanx for your comments.

Jon :)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext