SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR)
CCUR 1,940-14.0%Jul 30 2:38 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: VeloSpeed who wrote (10047)7/8/1999 4:53:00 PM
From: Nimbus  Read Replies (4) of 21143
 
Let's hope you're right !

I'd say it could speed things up, and more servers would/could be sold faster. I'm not sure if SFA or GIC would participate in embedding their logic in TVs. I'd doubt it. One complant about the SFA/GIC STBs is they are not "expandable" as the market will demand they be. The TV industry realizes and are building great scalability/connectivity into their iTV TVs. It's much cheaper for the TV designer to build it right in, and I suspect they have been doing just this for the last few years to have units ready to build when the infrastructure is ready.

With such a "in-home" scheme, you should be able to get the VOD stream (and internet service) from either cable or DSL and route it to any/all TVs and PCs in the Home Network, just like you can with analog (in the case of the TV signal). SFA/GIC has stripped out every extra transistor in order to make the STBs cheap ... like they always have done with STBs, and I think TV makers are taking advantage of that "habit" in order to gain market share ... sell more and fancier TVs.

Should be fun ... but yes .... let's crank out some servers ! All the VOD servers I'm familiar with should be able to work with such none-STB schemes in theory.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext