KLN
I received this today:
Subject:
HITT
Date:
Thu, 08 Jul 1999 17:58:35 -0400
From:
Matt Healey of Raging Bull <matthew@ragingbull.com>
Organization:
Raging Bull, Inc.
To:
xxxxx@xxxx.com
Raging Bull, Inc.
July 8, 1999
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Re: Subpoena for Member Information
Dear mshater:
Raging Bull, Inc. has received a subpoena duces tecum issued by the
District Court, District of Massachusetts, on behalf of Hitsgalore.com,
Inc., in the matter of Hitsgalore.com, Inc. v. mshater. The subpoena
duces tecum commands Raging Bull, Inc. to identify you as the owner of
screen name mshater [and to supply other information with respect to
your use of the Raging Bull service.]
As set forth in our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, it is Raging
Bull's policy to protect the privacy of its Members consistent with its
obligations under law. The Terms of Service state:
"The Raging BullÔ reserves the right to disclose any information,
including registration data, in order to comply with any applicable
current laws and/or government requests, for the protection of the
corporation and its members."
It is Raging Bull's policy to require service of a valid subpoena
before it will disclose Member identity information. Upon receipt of a
valid subpoena in a civil case, Raging Bull will attempt to notify the
Member(s) whose information is sought, so that the Member may, if he or
she so chooses, pursue any legal remedy that may be available to him or
her.
Pursuant to the subpoena, Raging Bull plans to produce the requested
documents on or after July 28, 1998.
If you would like us to send you a copy of the subpoena to you, please
send us a return electronic mail message with your address.
Very truly yours,
Matthew Healey
Webmaster@ragingbull.com
DCDOCS: 153169.1 (3@6p01!.doc)
What's the diff between "subpoena duces tecum issued" and your basic one.
I thought the suit was filed in Florida.
MH |
