confluence,
"""My hunch is that the data points to a less than homogenous orebody that will need much more work, possibly explaining the need for a permit to do bulk samples of 40,000 tonnes."""""
If you care to review past NR's with CF data, you may notice that the CF results reported for the dyke up to April 29, 1999, were amazingly consistent, save the CF results for just one sample....that particular sample was from pit#1, which was about 50% of the rest of the CF results......
It is clear that there are now many traders on this thread who are flat and would love to buy back in at lower prices....the laughable part is that most if not all are ignorant about diamond exploration and results(I assume they are genuinely ignorant and not deliberately posting falsehoods).....even more humorous, is the apparently genuine indignation when the stock price fluctuations, volumes and trading does not meet their expectations:-))...(Fixer is an exception here)...IMO, this thread is fast becoming comedy central....I do get a laugh out of traders who are full of themselves:-).....Frankly, with the decrease in volume and decrease in price volitility (I interpret this as disciplined and steady accumulation where the stock is being "cleaned up" at ever higher prices), I am surprised that the traders simply haven't move on....surely there are better trading opportunities and situations for them out there? As I have stated previously, perhaps someone should start a Winspear thread for traders......
regards,
teevee
regards,
teevee |
