Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: fyo who wrote (64583)	7/9/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (1) of 1583515

fyodor, <That's a really bad example. It seems Paul was pretty much right on with his estimate of 60W at 600MHz. GlobalWin (maker of cooling equipment) has a page up that lists the heat dissipation for the K7 (as well as the P3 and the Celery): globalwin.com.tw 50W at 600MHz according to this. > Man, you are generous. Being is 20% off isn't pretty much right, and if my memory serves me right the debate was about 550 MHz K7 - so it is more than 20% delta. My contention at the time this debate was going on was that the 60W number Paul kept referring to was for 700 MHz and K7 is designed for speeds much higher than 550 and would not have any problems at 550. During this time Paul spewed the FUD about heat problems and how K7 was "unmanufacturable". <That's 50% more than a PIII running 600MHz!> I don't think anyone expected PIII and K7 power dissipations to be comparable so this particular data point is of no consequence - at least for me. The only place larger power dissipation makes a lot of difference is in laptops and I expect K7 laptop chips to happen only after 180nm and that too many speed grades under the desktop product line. Chuck

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next