SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SOFC vrs PEM Fuel Cells (Debate Forum)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: blue_chip who wrote (51)7/10/1999 12:10:00 AM
From: CH4   of 79
 
To sum it all up there should be an understanding that as the parameters of the debate are based on the analyst report 'hydrogen gas is very explosive' the responses all agree, and the hydrogen bomb statement is relevant. That is why after the last 'hydrogen fusion' scam there is not very many corporations that work with gases interested this time around. Each gas has a distinct percentage of what is called the upper and lower limits of flammability as well as upper and lower limits of explosiveness. C.R.Lum should get honourable mention for acetleyne because that is the gas of choice in the trades for working in metals. We also use naptha,propane, methane, butane, and carbon monoxide, we mix these gases with air or industrial grade oxygen depending on what melting point is required. We also use a variety of inert gases dependent upon what welding or cutting procedure and quality that's specified. Nitrogen is the most helpful because it is not flammable but it will explode and it is the most abundant. I'll finish by saying that steam is actually a gas, it contains both hydrogen and oxygen, steam is non-flammable but is very explosive.

P.S. Jim P. mentioned Nano fibres which deserves to be part of the topic of storage and transportation of gases.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext