|
Casey First of all I didn't attack him as you so eloquently put it. I do not think he was giving GPJ a fair shake, and I still don't. The reasons are because they have a huge strike zone of over 5 km by roughly a quarter of a km. That is big. Although they have not officially tied all the zones together by lack of drilling to close this question off, the fact remains that the project size is a very large, shallow open pitable project which could be in excess of 10 million oz. Similar projects in the area have produced 140 million oz and 40 million oz of gold by state owned mining companies. That's potential, certainly a hell of a lot bigger potential than 23 cents a share. There, a little DD goes a long way, doesn't it. When I don't see that in print I will allways question ones motives, that's what these threads are for. To find out the underlying truths and to give posters an objective opportunity to decide for themselves. I find it hard to understand how one can promote one company in the same project, yet still say that a stock trading at 23 cents is not undervalued, when you are saying such positive comments about their partner in the same breath. That gives me reason to question their posts. If you are an engineer as you say then you of all people would want to understand the reasoning for pumping one and not the other. In my books, he is not giving GPJ a fair shake on the opportunity scale. Maybe he has recommended it to his subscribers and doesn't want the stock to get away before they are in. That is alterior motives in my estimation, |
