SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR)
QLGC 16.070.0%Aug 24 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Technocrat who wrote (23224)7/10/1999 2:27:00 PM
From: Technocrat  Read Replies (7) of 29386
 
==== Part II of FC Observations =====

* Fibre channel drives actually cost a little less to make than SCSI.
I did not know this.

* IBM's 3.5" drive which formats to nearly 40Gb is commercially
available in quantity. Plus they are cheap. In other words,
Seagate blew their 18-month FC lead and let IBM take the reins.
IBM is suppose to come out with the 80Gb drive "real soon now"
which means backup is going to become an acute problem.

* Dell's multi-billion dollar pact with IBM had a lot to do with disk
drive technology. Mikey and Louis on the same team, yikes! I bought
more DELL stock. Cheap mail-order PCs are going to start having very
large drives by next quarter.

* Vixel is well respected in the FC world. Every lab I visited has
Vixel equipment. They have more influence than I originally thought.

* I heard grumbling regarding Sun's StoreX product. It is not as good
as it should be as far as customers are concerned. Sun is working
on it so I am told.

* I gained new respect for EMC's approach to FC. They built an
extremely reliable approach to mainframe storage by essentially
creating disk drives in memory in a caching type of arrangement. IBM
mainframes are very picky about how they talk to disk drive farms and
EMC solved the problem by building a foolproof, but very expensive,
solution. EMC has had less success in convincing Open Systems (Unix)
shops to pay mainframe prices, however. EMC is putting a lot of eggs
in the future of SAN management and storage service.

--- Ice, when you asked EMC's IR if they were
using Brocade switches a la McData, are you
sure their denial was not limited to the
mainframe stuff?

* SAN management is still a black art. There are good opportunities
for outside companies to write software which could tune a
configuration.

* One theme I heard over and over again was that the storage guys are
making many of the same mistakes the networking folks tripped over ten
years ago. Hiring experienced networking engineers could accelerate
future development.

* Speculation is that GE and FC are close enough in timing that with a
little electrical engineering wizardry, FC could carry GE. 3COM and
Cisco are aware of this. I have yet to smoke out anyone who will
admit to doing these bench experiments. Wouldn't that be interesting?

* Both Ancor and Brocade have a lot of innovation to look forward to.
The future will make current setups look like the Wright brothers at
Kitty Hawk. Declaring any company the eventual winner of FC switch
space is premature.

* To put the previous bullet into perspective, I got to see throughput
numbers obtained from a stock Dell NT server fitted out with two QLogic
adapters pumping out bytes to the maximum bus speeds. The numbers are
in the same range as top of the line supercomputers a few years
ago. Fibre channel is going to be an interesting ride...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext