Darrell, I assume the bold and repetition at the end of 'Taxpayer' post are yours.
Perhaps you meant repetitious, but regardless, statement is still not clear.
When Nixon was undergoing removal, my sole justification was his continuing to kill my friends and risk myself and family in Vietnam.
Statement not clear, did you leave out a word after justification? Did you and your family go to Vietnam? Was Nixon undergoing removal? Nixon resigned, he was not removed.
There was a lesser sentiment for my friends who had died and gone to prison under his enforcement of our strange drug laws. Statement not clear, did your friends die and then go to prison? Your statement, regarding "strange drug laws" is interesting. What is strange about our drug laws? Do you do drugs? Do you use drugs while you type responses to this forum?
The power abuse charges came later. I wonder if these alone, bad as they were, would have sufficed to power through his destruction without the large scale killing. Statement is not clear. Do you ever proofread your work?
Clinton has never had this kind of foundation pushing against him. I do not understand where the passion comes from. I suspect 'Reagan's legacy' is in there somewhere. Statement is not clear. What are you trying to say?
You know how I feel about the reliability of your sources. Injustice occurs all the time, from many sources. Just look at this thread, from either of our views. Injustice should be addressed individually, and righted. But, ultimately, I think injustice is temporary, and overcome by good people doing their best.
At last, statement that makes sense.
|
