I was just going to lurk here and probably will after this, but the arguments here are old, not meaningful and ignore many facts. They might have applied at one time, but not now that an article has been submitted with major university support, not now since there has been good acceptance at an international pharmacologic meeting and not now since there are orders, well beyond what was initIally expected, for approximately 40,000 USA stores. Do you think
1. the orders really do not exist?
2.the orders will not be paid for?
Those 2 possibilities would be good assumptions on which to base a short. I am only trying to figure out what is the logic here that goes beyond an admitted 3-minute look at a balance sheet.
Anyway, here is a decent post link from Yahoo that was succinct and nonemotional.
messages.yahoo.com
I really do not care if you short. I am holding this long, long long. It will take you awhile to go through the financing agreement, but it is favorable to shareholders - I think Dan has explained that well.
If you are going to short, do it soon, please. |
