SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Father Terrence who wrote (44880)7/11/1999 6:29:00 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
<<The majority of the responsibility lies with the drunk driver who smashed into them at 70 mph.>>

There was a case in Chicago about 8 years ago where a guy who was blind drunk went off the tollway while speeding. He was thrown from his vehicle because he was not wearing his belt even though it was the law. He was quite a ways from the road and a guy wire to a telephone pole cut his head off. Drunk, speeding and no belt and the pole was on right of way ground and his family collected $20 million from GTE.

I think the way they are doing liability in Florida where the responsibility is shared makes sense. Ambulance chasers don't like it much though.

I had a lawyer tell me that a cast is worth a $10,000 settlement no matter what.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext