Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (64805)	7/11/1999 11:57:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) of 1579400

FF, <I know exactly what predatory pricing is....and it's not Intel cutting prices to stay in line with AMD.> Really? Who was that company that dumped to the low-end PC market the chip called Celeron? Exactly the same chip as their flagman P-II but priced 4 times lower? (Please don't tell me that they shaved off a $5 cache chips) <no one really (except perhaps Scumbria) believes that AMD can destroy Intel,..> There are evidences that there is more than one person who fears this. Your own open vocalizm on this (AMD) thread is a proof. No matter how you or lawyers would define the term "predatory pricing", it is clear that the success of AMD is solely dependent on destruction of Intel. Why? Because all Intel business model is based on monopolistic pricing. AMD presence poses the greatest threat to this monopolistic ability. On the other hand, as it is typical to a monopoly, Intel slowed down in technical innovation and cannot deliver any new design so far. That's why Intel has no other real alternative but rushlessly destroy any competition, and they are perfectly executing these plans.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next