SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?*

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: orkrious who wrote (11182)7/12/1999 10:19:00 AM
From: blankmind  Read Replies (2) of 30916
 
james cramer has in the past shown up on a board to defend himself, i guess hg will not be doing the same. i wonder if hg considers the fact that he did not mention for a couple of days the return call as libel from the boards? another article, this time mentioning a corrupt company, media vision, without mentioning the ab rebuttal of hg.

how about a journalist analogy as to why investors might have written hg. remember the journalist that won the pulitzer prize a couple years back writing about poor kids? she made up the stories. she later said they could have happened and probably did. now i am not saying hg made up any part of the story on idtc or fabricated any part. but i have now put hg and this reporter in the same story. just like we have seen shorts who like to compare idtc to a bb stock.

and the other part of hg less than credible piece is his straw man arguments. notice he has picked the weakest points to respond to, not the strong points that have been raised to his article. ie why not discuss why he did not mention they returned his call later than day, instead of waiting days to disclose this?

clearly hg readers must have no clue of logical arguments and hence easily fooled, probably why cramer has his disclaimer.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext