SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MikeM54321 who wrote (4586)7/12/1999 6:47:00 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) of 12823
 
Hi Mike,

I'm doing this from memory so bear with me.

The answer to the question of how many telco subscribers can utilize xDSL is not nearly 100%. One limitation is that for all but one flavor of xDSL, the practical distance from the CO to any subscriber node is 18,000 feet. In one instance, a new technolology (DSL Lite <?>) is allowing for signalling up to 20,000 feet. In the US the number of subscribers who are at too great a distance from the CO is approximately 20%, in Europe, the excluded lines are on the order of 5% because of the smaller footprints of local networks on the Continent. I, for one, live 45,000 feet from the CO and I will never get DSL at my location until some new and wonderful DSLAM type solution can be deployed into the neighborhoods and thereby reduce the inherent attenuation on the UTP to an acceptable level.

At present, there are over 3,000 COs that are capable of servicing ADSL. This has grown from about 1,800 at the end of 1998.

DSL lite really won't compete with cable modems. But it's something the telcos or CLEC could deploy fairly quickly. As a student of Machiavelli, I would say that the lite stuff will serve a purpose in the FUD arena vis a vis cable modems.

Ciao, Ray
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext