SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles R who wrote (65010)7/13/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (6) of 1578730
 
Thread,

Look carefully at Intel's numbers. Go to the bottom of the press release and you will see this.

**********************

INTEL CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION (In millions)
Q2 '99 Restated Q1 '99 YTD 1999 Q2 '98 YTD 1998
OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION:

Intel Architecture Business Group:
Revenues 5,559 6,429 11,988 5,240 10,655
Operating profit 2,305 2,944 5,249 1,649 3,509

All other:
Revenues 1,187 674 1,861 687 1,273
Operating (loss) 15 (307) (292) (43) (122)

*******************************

It cost Intel $600M+ to compete with AMD (and CYRX) last quarter (IABG profits from Q1 - profits from Q2 = $2,944M - $2,305M = $639M).

And the "interest and other income" category went up by about $150M - a good $50M more than I thought they would put in that category AND they still came up 2 cents shorts from the already lowered 53 cents estimate!

Does any one see this differently?

Chuck

P.S.: On the brighter side for AMD longs, if the statements about second half are right, pricing sanity may infact be back (and probably a more linear price curve).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext