PYNG Technologies Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: m. jacobs who wrote (4172)	7/14/1999 1:38:00 PM
From: AriKirA	Read Replies (2) of 8117

We could have, for example, gone right into production after receiving FDA approval in 1997 and that was our intention. In retrospect I believe our collective decision to go into field trials was a correct one and one that has provided a great deal of appropriate feedback for a much improved, better quality, better performing F.A.S.T 1 System. Just a question from one of those hardcore posters. How could of you gone right into production when in fact you, as mentioned in your latest statement, hadn't even abided by the strict regulations governing such production? Now, am I correct in assessing that there was a timing problem or did management simply overlook certain critical and obvious delays incurred by such approvals... Something is just not right.... too many contradictory comments IMO AK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next