SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : USRX

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scrapps who wrote (16361)3/24/1997 3:26:00 AM
From: Robert Graham   of 18024
 
Its probably a good idea not to sell modems that do not support a standard. If the company did, and a standard was developed, how are they going to handle their customers with their recently purchased modems that just have been outdated by the new standard modems that come out. For that matter, I have learned over many years of supporting dial-in end users always to go with standards and equipment that implements them faithfully. This sidesteps alot of hassles for both the service provider and the customer, for example. And I am sure this would save problems for Micron and their customers.

The benefit from 2x modems have not been proven in what can be considered a "typical" phone connection at this point in time. This modem would require an unusually clean connection that is digitized at least at one end. This is not the case for a significant amount of modem users. For that matter, line quality varies with repspect to time of day and outside temperature. So, when the smoke clears on this type of modem, I think there will be quite a few disappointed people out there, that is if they are an intelligent enough of a user to notice the difference between 24K and 56K, or have a demanding application that would reveal the difference.

Finally, a company that looks at the bigger picture. I would be surprised if the unavailability of 2x modems will keep customers from purchasing their computers.

Bob Graham

Bob Graham
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext