SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
KCG 20.000.0%Aug 17 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raymond James Norris who wrote (2379)7/14/1999 7:04:00 PM
From: Sir Francis Drake  Read Replies (1) of 10027
 
Raymond Norris - thank you for your analysis, and for sharing your thoughts. As a past critic, let me stress that I appreciate any opinion/analysis you may have regarding NITE or any other stock. I also appreciate the fact that you are sharing information without the distraction of promoting your site (that was my *only* problem with any of your posts).

On a different note, weren't you a tiny bit premature when you came on here recently as NITE was bumping against the 60-64 barrier, to announce that NITE is on the verge of a breakout? That really does not qualify as a breakout when the stock soon thereafter declines steadily until it hits an intraday low of 52. You spoke of a "head and shoulders" pattern - ummm... it is not nice when an additional decline occurs on the other side of such a magnitude. Interestingly, at the same time frame that you posted your "breakout" post, a poster on another board posted an analysis that *accurately* predicted: "Breakout? Not yet":

boards.fool.com

Now, wouldn't you say, his diagnosis was far more accurate than yours? Note, he said "not yet" - meaning, you and many like you were too early. In this trading game (as opposed to *investing*), timing is everything. As a trader (not investor), it was a *mistake* to buy at the time of your breakout announcement. By contrast, that poster was *right*. Sure, you can say - it will go up in the future - ummm... we know that. The questions is *when*. You called it too early - that's the plain fact.

Anyway, to err is human, and an exchange of views is useful.

On a joking note - I noticed on the Yahoo board there is a character "allnigher_99" who maliciously associates your posts appearing, with NITE tanking. Thus far, he has been uncannily right - several times. As a NITE long, aren't you concerned posting today? Of course, I'm kidding - and I fully expect/hope that with today's posting you finally broke the spell of bad luck coincidence of your bullish posts followed by NITE tanking.

I too am a NITE bull, though as a hands on trader, I tend to pay more attention to other additional factors which I found useful. Thus far, I have made good money in NITE (and I've posted my trades here, in a timely manner). Every trader does some form of TA - the trick is to find what works for you. I'm glad your TA works for you.

Good luck!

Morgan

PS - NITE did not "bounce" off your $55 target - it "bounced" off the $52 price (as I posted here, I shorted NITE just under $60, and covered - posting at the time - my cover at 52 1/2, and I went long at 52 3/4 - all this was posted intraday at the time of my trades). What NITE has done is to close at $55 twice so far - which is not exactly a "bounce" (technically, this might qualify as "closing support", but it certainly is not a "bounce"). In other words, the correct buy-in should be at the bounce point of $52 area - not the $55 number. If you set an order for NITE at $55, you'd be sitting on a "no-gain" for the second day - as a trader, it is not acceptable.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext