You can't grow weary doing something you haven't done, Terrence.
You have not yet explicated the mysterious nature of the "non-fiction articles" you claim, redundantly and foolishly, to have written.
I asked for not a single one of the six answers you pretended to believe relevant to this discussion, btw. I do understand the pretence, however. You wanted to obfuscate your original silly error in usage. You can't bear to say the simple words, "I made a mistake," and so you prattle. Irrelevantly.
And in number 3 you repeat your original error, you silly person.
And in number 2 you make a confession I'm sure was inadvertent, lol!
FT, this is a high-concept issue, so your usual obfuscatory tactics will be even more than usually lacking in effectiveness.
Here is the issue, and the question. This time don't answer six other unasked and immaterial ones:
Hey, Terrence, you know those two articles you say you wrote for two investment pubs?
You described them as "non-fiction articles," remember? And I, surprised that an English scholar such as you wouldn't know such a thing, pointed out that all 'articles' are 'non-fiction' (except hoaxes and satires.) A statement with which you evidently disagree.
So... what is a "fiction article" that is neither a hoax nor a satire?
My prediction: you will never "respond to" that simple question.
But you can! Just write these words:
"I was wrong in my usage and my claim, and I admit it."
It's easy! Put your fingers on the keyboard....
P.S. Terrence, for your future reference: Substitute the word 'pieces' for the word 'articles' and you'll be fine. "Non-fiction pieces" is what writers say, to indicate that they've written an article or review or critique or other non-fiction... piece. |
