SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
LRCX 153.34-5.0%Nov 13 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jerome who wrote (7983)7/14/1999 10:46:00 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) of 10921
 
Jerome,

If LRCX was the only one, this would seem to be a plausible argument. But AMAT certainly had the resources to withstand the downturn. The TFT/FPD business was a very small portion of their revenues so this is additional evidence IMO that they just did not see TFT/FPD's as a key to their growth. Whether they did so because of squeezed margins is a matter of assumption. My belief is that since most of the FPD producers are Japanese and the Japanese are notorious for "working with their own," that AMAT et al had a difficult time competing with the home team of TEL. This is mere conjecture on my part but the pieces of the puzzle seem to fit.

Regards,

Brian
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext