SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : MPVIF Mountain Province Mining

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tom eland who wrote (2005)7/16/1999 10:18:00 AM
From: MJB  Read Replies (2) of 2577
 
This is a classic case of a major mining company (De Beers) having a "bear hug" on the junior j.v. partner. The only defense that MPV can mount is through the promotion of the price of the stock and the raising of capital.

Geologically, it simply doesn't get ANY better than this. To have the stock trade at such a steep discount to the norm is a direct function of a lack of institutional following. No one's fault, but a reality.

That is about to change drastically and NOT due to anything management has done or will do.

The insitu value of the ore body is the product of three numbers: Tonnage, Grade, and Value per carat. We can assume tonnage (35MM+); we know grade (5034 - 1.71 cts./tonne) and will soon know Hearne, Tuzo, and Tesla grades but the third variable will arrive in August. So until that third variable arrives, there will be speculation but the big players won't take the big positions until it does.

When the diamond values are finally out, the analysts plug the three numbers into their models, and you get a number somewhere around U.S.$7-10 as a target price. I plugged the numbers into my model using U.S.$51 / carat as a benchmark and arrived at a VERY big number.

Bottom line: Do I have to spell it out???
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext