Dear Ron,
I understand how you might see what I am doing as mere company hype, and I understand (and I'm not saying this to just placate you) how you might take umbrage to words in the category of "but". In fact, I'm more than willing to compromise with you. Unfortunately, the compromise must begin after this posting, for I've already answered Popiye in terms of the B word. However, I'll try to utilize the nome de plume of Ranger when disseminating information. For example, Scoobey and Jorj asked questions, and I believe I responded with lightning rapidity with good information and follow through. So, when I do that kind of stuff, I'll make every attempt not to proselytize the "product."
However, I stake claim to another hat - that of an investor on the THREAD. I'll use my real name Manny for that.
Now, when I say I do see the value of your argument, as I mentioned, I am not just catering to the shareholder. I got killed on a stock called Wide Com - and I mean killed - because of misinformation and over-hype. So I do empathize with you.
I'm going to hope you can sympathize with the following point I am going to make. Yes the THREAD is read by a lot of people not in the THREAD, and that more than likely includes those who know nothing about our stock. They may be taking a peek. Letting them know that this company has immense potential and that they might be looking at a bargain is absolutely essential to the success of ECNC. I am also very aware that others are watching, too.
In short, when I, Manny Vavolizza, the stockholder, want to clarion what I see as the potentials of this company and Tom Hughes, I'll use my birth certificate name, and "Ranger" will stick to the facts, all the facts, (Are you old enough to remember Dragnet?. The Ranger shall not use the B word!
Sincerely wanting to compromise with you,
Ranger |
