Madhur,
I am really enjoying your recent enhancement to let us weight your studies to come up with our own "ranking". I look at and print the ranking three or four times per day, and then that night, look at the results to try to "fine tune" my weighting factors.
So far, I am having the most luck weighting study # 4 (Volume/20 day average), and study # 11 (Change up since last close) with the highest weights.
When I print the rankings, I get the following printout:
Highest Rank across all Studies
52.5 IDTI (09:54:24, 8210(11) to 15640)
49.8 ESTI (10:15:51, 7790(14) to 15640)
48.4 CYMI (09:54:24, 7570(17) to 15640)
47.9 KELL (14:45:52, 7490(15) to 15640)
44.9 MCHP (09:54:24, 7030(11) to 15640)
>44.4 CLSR (14:45:52, 6940(17) to 15640)
41.9 INFY (10:15:52, 6550(21) to 15640)
41.3 IRID (09:54:24, 6460(12) to 15640)
40.8 PAIR (09:54:24, 6380(8) to 15640)
39.3 ANDW (09:54:24, 6150(9) to 15640)
37.2 PMCS (14:45:47, 5820(19) to 15640)
37.0 HRBC (14:45:07, 5790(10) to 15640)
35.0 BBBY (09:54:24, 5480(11) to 15640)
34.3 RFMD (09:54:24, 5370(12) to 15640)
33.2 SNRS (14:45:19, 5190(13) to 15640)
33.1 KERA (14:45:46, 5180(12) to 15640)
32.9 QLTI (14:45:07, 5150(10) to 15640)
Could you please explain the significance of the columns so I can consider them in my evaluations?
Also, I would be interested to know if anyone would like to share how they are weighting the various studies to arrive at investment opportunities.
Thanks
Jim |
