All we know is that YOU posted what YOU said YOU were told. NO ONE else to my knowledge has substantiated what YOU said and how YOU interpreted it. Has anyone else talked to Lehman's? Or should it be...Has Lehman's talked to ANYONE??? LU isn't happy someone asks questions? Then the deal must be $hit then, right? YOU post a lot of info from emails, phone calls, etc. that CANNOT BE SUBSTANTIATED. Has anyone else received that same info on their own? Why does the company feel "threatened"? WHAT do you base your INFERENCE on? WHERE is the hard proof that what the company told you is wrong? Again, it's just your word,isn't it?
Now, before you reply with a long drawn out explanation of how and why YOUR inferences and conclusions should be what others should rely on, I hope YOU get MY point. YOU could be the greatest DD'er on SI. YOU could also be talking the stock down. YOU could be 100% correct. YOU could also be full of it. WITHOUT FURTHER SUBSTANTIATION BY OTHERS OF THE INFO YOU SAY YOU GAINED FROM YOUR EMAILS, CALLS, ETC., IT MEANS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Don't take offense at this; just try to understand where I'm coming from. And if you're wondering why I haven't posted anything here in a week, it's because I've been in Canada, not because of any other reason that may be inferred. And no, I'm not Canadian. But my first name is Welsh, so there can be a U.K. connection.
Cheers,
Berwyn |
