Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 34.50

+2.6%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Amy J who wrote (85920)	7/18/1999 4:34:00 PM
From: dumbmoney	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Historically, Cyrix appears to have had better graphics than Intel. Cyrix is known in the industry for having superior graphics. In fact, as Scumbria has pointed out, that was one of the biggest mistakes NSM made: putting graphics as a higher priority than MHz processor speed. Speed sells, not graphics, in the PC business. NSM lost the MHz battle to Intel. I don't know where you got the notion that "Cyrix has better graphics". That has never been true, and it's certainly not true now. National's much-hyped PCOAC uses an obsolete 2D (yes TWO-D!) graphics core. It's a warmed-over MediaGX.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next