Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (65951)	7/18/1999 8:26:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) of 1573696

Kevin - Re: "Doesn't change the fact that the CuIN2000mine is DELAYED because Intel can't yield the on chip L2 at the highest speed grades (600 MHz+ on .18u). " True - the Coppermine introduction was delayed until November. Also true is the fact that the 600 MHz Coppemine introduction in November WILL BE MET ! Re: "Doesn't say much for Intel's process technology, IMHO " No it doesn't it. But Intel found the problem, worded out a solution, VERIFIED the solution, and has already begun to implement the solution in order to meet the November launch schedule. That DOES SAY a HELLUVA LOT about Intel's process engineers and technology. Compare this to AMD's 1 year delay in introducing any 233 MHz K6's on 0.35 micron and their 6 month delay in getting 400 MHz K6-2's introduced in Q498 and Q199. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next