SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 496.920.0%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (26591)7/18/1999 11:47:00 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Hi Sir Francis Drake; Great series of posts on super buy or sell messages from thomsoninvest.net. I have a comment on how they are computing the percentage of trading due to institutions.

I suspect that the reported numbers for institutional action is exaggerated by thomsoninvest. AMZN provides a good example. The top three market makers on the stock are ISLD, MASH, and NITE, as of the month of June, 1999. They provided 26, 8 and 5% of the total volume, for a total of 39% of volume. Link:
nasdaqtrader.com
To look up the percent of trades done by the various market makers, go to the NasdaqTrader.com web site and click on "Trading Data". Or use the following link:
nasdaqtrader.com

It is already agreed that MASH and NITE are more or less retail. (Or is it?) My observation on ISLD is that the majority of their trading is very much retail. In fact, the majority of it tends to be fast moving day traders, of which I am one.

But the thomsoninvest web site lists the retail percentage as only 17% for AMZN:
thomsoninvest.net

I have two guesses. The first is that all ECNs are being added into the institutional numbers. The second is that there are a lot more shares being traded by the institutions, but are not reported to the Nasdaq, or are not included in the figures. Any ideas?

-- Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext