SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (46111)7/19/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
Unless you have a good idea that there is something there, I would never let
you have access.

That assumes you have a choice. Our judges will give it to me if I can make even a remotely feasible claim to relevance. Basically, they want the information on the table. They do NOT want to give primary residence to person A and find out a year or two later that person A was writing in their diary how they were plotting to deny visitation to person B as much as they could. They also don't want to deal with motions to reopen on the grounds that it came out that person A had improperly squirreled money away and mention of was made in the diary or personal records the person B requested but was refused access to.

So they basically let it all hang out an let the couple finish the fight the first time with all the ammunition they can muster.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News