SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Green Bay Packers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SE who wrote (568)7/20/1999 10:37:00 AM
From: SE  Read Replies (1) of 1150
 
This was emailed to me. Good story and hits it right on the money.

-Scott
--------------------
West Coast Offensive
by Tom Freeman <TFreeman@brobeck.com>

Monday, July 19, 1999

Desmond Howard Returns

Can six months really have gone by since that unfortunate day in January?
Can training camp really be starting in less than a week? It is high time
that I shake off my post-season lethargy and sit down and write an article.

Of all of the things that have taken place this off-season, the one that I
am most excited about is the return of Desmond Howard. His career with the
Raiders was lucrative for him, but otherwise a disaster. While, presumably,
the Raiders gave him a shot to make a name for himself as a receiver (why
else would they have paid him that much money?), he did not pan out. He had
decent statistics as a kick returner, but nothing like his year of glory in
Green Bay.

So we now know that Desmond Howard is not a viable starting receiver in the
NFL. OOPS! I guess we knew that before. It turns out that the great Al
Davis was not smarter than the Packers and the Redskins and the Jaguars,
after all.

But he is a heck of a kick returner. Who can forget the way he
single-handedly destroyed the 49ers in the "Freezing Rain Bowl" in the first
playoff game that year? Or the way he snuffed out the Patriots' comeback
attempt, just like that? True, he didn't exactly set the AFC-West on fire
during his two year stint with the Raiders. True, his year with the Packers
could have been an extraordinarily lucky fluke. And even if it wasn't he
could be all washed up now, three years later.

I'm betting that he is not washed up. I think the key to understanding
Desmond Howard's phenomenal year with the Packers is the fact that they have
had good special teams for a number of years. All kinds of players have
been shuttled in and out (Schroeder, Preston, Beebe, even Robert Brooks a
few years back) and they have all done pretty well, although some have had
questions raised about fumbles, poor decision-making and the like. So my
theory as to why Howard's years with the Raiders were not that spectacular
is that the Raiders' special teams play generally does not match up with the
special teams of the Packers. And the returner can't do it all by himself.

To put it a different way, the magic of 1996 resulted from the rare
combination of really good special teams play, and a really good kick
returner. (OK, and probably some good luck, too.) Take away one, and the
magic disappears, which is what happened the last two years. Put them back
together and the sky is the limit.

So we will see. If Howard still has it, his game could make a big
difference for the Packers. If he doesn't, they can keep Arnold or someone
else as their returner, and they have lost very little (basically just the
signing bonus).

I'm looking forward to the season already.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext