SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : NetBank(NTBK)-formerly Atlanta Internet Bank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TLindt who wrote (2021)7/20/1999 11:14:00 PM
From: jjs_ynot  Read Replies (2) of 2414
 
Unflattering article from "The Street.com"

Weak Revenue Growth Spurs a
Run on Net.B@nk Stock
By Peter Eavis
Senior Writer
7/20/99 2:13 PM ET

Net.B@nk's (NTBK:Nasdaq) stock dropped sharply
Tuesday after the Internet bank reported
weaker-than-expected revenue growth, reviving
doubts about its expansion plans.

Revenue, which frequently replaces earnings as the
focus for investors in Internet companies, totaled
$4.9 million after provisions in the second quarter,
compared with $1.6 million in the year-ago period.

That's a whopping 197% increase. But latest
second-quarter revenue fell substantially short of
analysts' projections. BancBoston Robertson
Stephens, which rates Net.B@nk a buy, had
projected $6 million in revenue, while First Security
Van Kasper, which has a sell recommendation on
the stock, had predicted $5.4 million. (Robbie
Stephens underwrote the bank's June secondary
offering. First Security and Net.B@nk have no
investment banking relationship.)

Net.B@nk didn't return calls seeking comment.

Net.B@nk, which went public in July 1997 after being
founded in February 1996, was off 3 3/8, or 11%, at
27 3/8.

The bank's shares had more than tripled this year
as investors came to believe in the bank's business
model, which, put simply, envisions the institution
rapidly attracting deposits with above-average
interest rates. Net.B@nk can offer these higher
rates, so the theory goes, because it doesn't have to
spend large sums on bricks-and-mortar branches.

Account growth remained strong. At the end of the
second quarter, Net.B@nk had more than 39,000
accounts, up 230% from the year-ago period and
ahead some 60% from the first quarter's end.

But, says First Security's Jeff Runnfeldt: "What good
is account growth if it doesn't translate into expected
revenue growth?"

Runnfeldt advised investors to sell Net.B@nk in May,
when he published a note that raised big questions
about dedicated Internet banks. He points out that
while Internet banks avoid branch costs, they are
disadvantaged by higher funding costs and
lower-yielding reinvestment strategies.

In addition, says Runnfeldt, Net.B@nk will feel the
squeeze from established bricks-and-mortar banks
that are setting up Internet services for customers.

Robbie Stephens' Bryan Keane, however, remains
more sanguine about Net.B@nk's outlook. The
disappointing second-quarter revenue growth can
be explained chiefly by the fact that the bank didn't
manage to use the deposits for higher-yielding loans
as quickly as he had assumed, he says. "The
Internet banking model is still valid," he adds.

For the second quarter ended June 30, Net.B@nk
reported net income of $768,000, or 3 cents a
share, up from $158,000, or 1 cent a share, in the
year-before period. The year-earlier period's results
exclude a $3 million tax benefit.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext