SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : LifeOne, Inc. (LONE)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GlenRP who wrote (1430)7/21/1999 5:41:00 PM
From: MonteChristo  Read Replies (1) of 1834
 
Thank you all . . . Maine was fantastic. There is nothing like being 10ft away from a humpback whale and her calf. Course two of my three boys learned what those little brown sacks were for the hard way.

Anyways, on to business. I noticed some "concern" over the earlier than expected judgement. I don't think it was early:

7/12/99 Oral argument heard. Case argued by Edwin Paul Keiffer for Appellant Black Sea Investment, William D Treeby for Appellee Life One Inc [99-30432] [99-30432]

7/15/99 Opinion filed. Issue Mandate due on 8/5/99. [99-30432][99-30432]

7/15/99 Judgment entered and filed. [99-30432] [99-30432]

7/15/99 COURT Order filed denying as moot appellee's motion to dismiss motion. (HANDLED IN OPINION) [1277549-1](HAP,EGJ,JMD) Copies to all counsel. [99-30432][99-30432]

Looks like the judge gave his "opinion" and "judgement" on the 15th and will wait until 8/5 until giving his "mandate"

I'm no lawyer but to me judgement seems to be a decision. Mandate seems to be an order to tell the lower court to act upon his decision. Least that's how I read it. That's why the in the last entry the motion to dismiss is considered "moot" or it makes no difference because the judgement has already come in LONE's favor.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext