SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (65058)7/23/1999 8:23:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (7) of 132070
 
To All, 1929 leverage vs. 1999 leverage. Many people will claim that we are less leveraged today due to higher margin requirements in the stock market. That is total nonsense and here is why:

1. There were no credit cards in 1929. Count all the folks you know who do not have credit cards. Then count all the ones who do not have such cards maxxed out.

2. Mortgages required one third as a down payment and there were no govt. agencies lending for no reason. Today, the borrower often gets a down payment equal to 25% of equity when he takes down a mortgage.

3. If people borrow to buy cars or houses instead of save to buy those things, and then buy stocks with their temporarily free cash flow, that is the same thing as borrowing to buy stocks.

4. Many more people are in stocks today and the % margined produces a # much higher than the %age in population increase. So, the crash will impact more folks directly.

5. The margin rules we talk about only apply to stocks. Bonds, derivatives, currencies, futures, etc., all of which are used at maximum proportions by our financial institutions, have much lower or even zero margins.

Conclusion: As a nation, we are much more margined and vulnerable to a market downturn than we were in 1929.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext