Dave,
I think we all need to relax and re-evaluate now.
ALL of us are in absolute agreement the procedure
should have passed, all we're doing is rehashing
our own version of YESTERDAY's Story!
It will NOT help whatsoever to take this approach.
If we add ALL the arguments together, (same-day, both eye),
why 24 mo, not 18, wouldn't they have let us known, etc., etc.
IT WILL NOT DO ANY GOOD.....Get IT!
We need to BEGIN NOW finding out what the "REAL" problem
was. Again, ALL who make the same argument (Russ too, I'm
sure is wondering how this happened), DON'T GET IT!
Auric got it, he first told us so July 16th, when he made
his first post. Now I can tell you if Auric "got it", and
he is one of the Best Shorter's there are, so did Asenio,
A@P, MP and countless other Shorts, who, Btw,
are very saavy investor's.
That, my friend, is exactly the point I'm making in calling
for an OUTSIDE Expert to evaluate "Everything" and make a
call on what went wrong. Don't you realize, the analyst from
Sweden, PA Merchant, all the other negative reports that
came out were saying the EXACT opposite of all we said and
thought. They couldn't believe how the procedure WOULD
get approved......so we can post how we feel here, get
it out of our systems to a degree, become poor(er), say
life isn't fair and the FDA are bastards on the take, etc.
Or we can take a new strategy!
Nuff said,
Skane |
