SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 165.13+1.1%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Valueman who wrote (144)7/24/1999 4:29:00 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) of 13582
 
It is my understanding that current cdmaOne licensees are already licensed for cdma2000. If they sell any other flavor of CDMA based 3G equipment, they have to sign another license agreement.

I may be wrong about this but I had thought in a previous conference call that the Q had stated Phillips was the only licensed CDMA2000 manufacturer. I believe this was due to a cross-licensing deal that the Q did a couple of years back. Not sure about this....but it is what I had based my previous comment on.

If the deals are already done, are the royalty percentages exactly the same as IS-95? I guess I am really wondering if MOT continues to have lower royalties as well as the right to sell their own ASIC's (not that many people would buy from them right now).

Slacker
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext