SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Let's end the national debt.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (6)7/26/1999 9:46:00 AM
From: Fangorn  Read Replies (1) of 109
 
Zeev,

Your condemnation of a flat or consumption tax conveniently ignores the fact that Forbe's flat tax plan gives a family of four an exemption for the first $34,000 of income (not sure this is the exact number but it is close) and every consumption tax proposal I have heard excludes food, medicine and medical care, some exclude rent, some give refunds to low income earners. Under both the hypothetical $20,000 earner would have little or NO TAX LIABILITY!!!

Also, we could tax those making over $200,000 a year at a rate of 100% and it would have little effect on what Joe Sixpack pays because there just aren't that many high earners out there.

Taxation should NOT be either a fiscal or monetary tool. It should ONLY be a way to equitably fund the NECESSARY services of government.
Just getting rid of the unnecessary, mostly unconstitutional, programs at the federal level would give us a tax cut that would make current "wild-eyed GOP" proposals look positively stingy. Of course that guy on TV selling a book about how to get grants for all sorts of stuff would have to find something else to do.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext