SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 252.31+1.0%12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Katherine Derbyshire who wrote (31614)7/26/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: Doug B.  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
1996 was one of the worst years on record for DRAM vendors, and therefore for their equipment suppliers. Yet, in 1996, DRAM bit volume soared. Volume of chips does not correlate to equipment purchases.

Future increases in bit volume will come not only from increased output in current production lines, but from the increases from 64Mb to 256Mb and beyond. These changes require new equipment.

No, but the people paying for the equipment care a lot. 1997 and 1998 demonstrated that the money to build those $2 billion fabs has to come from somewhere.

To stay competitive, new fabs are going to have to be built, or old ones will need retooling. It seems that the pressures from 300mm, copper, and feature shrinks are building to the point where this is increasingly true, and discretion in these purchases will become more and more inelastic.

Also, the PC is not dead, but I think other types of devices are becoming a larger segment of the chip market. Foundries are booked solid, so there is room for growth in fabs. Of course, the industry will overshoot this demand and set up the next bust cycle... :)

Just my .02

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext